delivery drivers are fed up with from the app. Some drivers are fighting back by gaming the system to give out high paying deliveries, and it appears that the strategy is actually working.

Drivers for apps like Uber, Lyft, InstaCart and DoorDash are fighting an uphill battle for better wages. California resulted in pay decreases for drivers, and one even estimated that the average DoorDash driver makes an astonishingly low $1.45 an hour.

Dave Levy and Nikos Kanelopoulos are DoorDash drivers aiming to change that. The pair launched a movement to get Dashers more pay, reports . The movement, , is over 40,000 members strong, and it has one goal in mind: Reject any delivery job that doesn’t pay at least $7. That way, drivers can make a livable wage.

The duo found out that when a Dasher (that’s what DoorDash calls a driver) declines a delivery, the app passes it onto another driver for slightly higher pay. DoorDash notes that Dashers are and that they don’t have to accept deliveries. Kanelopoulos and Levy figure that drivers could stick together and effectively raise the pay rate of a delivery from $3 to at least $7.

While many drivers may try their hardest to reach with high delivery acceptance rates, #DeclineNow members take pride in taking far fewer deliveries. As Bloomberg reports, Levy accepts only about 1 percent of the deliveries he is offered.

Members of #DeclineNow say that the tactics are working and drivers everywhere, including the Pennsylvania Lehigh Valley where Levy and Kanelopoulos operate, are getting paid more.

However, the strategy of gaming the system isn’t accepted by all Dashers; and some say that the #DeclineNow community is unwelcoming, from Bloomberg:

Some question the strict minimum fee rule, citing regional price differences. Others find #DeclineNow to be mean-spirited and toxic, a place where people try to ridicule and bully others into going along with their plan. “They put out information as facts without backing it up,” says Amy Lee, a DoorDash driver in the Dallas suburbs who runs the gig economy site PavementGrinders. “Then they publicly humiliate anyone who doesn’t understand or agree.”

Users who question the $7 minimum rule are punished with suspension from the group or, as the group’s moderators like to put it, “a trip to the dungeon.” One former moderator, Josie Lindström, claims to have personally suspended hundreds of people, saying the intolerance for dissent was necessary to keep the group moving in the right direction. “It has to be all of us, or it doesn’t work,” she says. But Lindström eventually quit, citing what she described as a toxic atmosphere.

That’s not a good look for the movement.

, a law professor at UC Hastings Law, says that these actions could be part of #DeclineNow’s success. But she finds that drivers who try to beat the algorithm find themselves disappointed, from Bloomberg:

But sustaining such collective action is complicated by the constant influx of new workers. The company will “give bonus incentives to a bunch of new drivers,” says Dubal. “And those drivers are not going to be a part of the club who know what to do. And then they’re like the scabs.” In trying to use algorithm-shifting strategies, she’s observed, drivers are “always really disappointed in the end.”

Still, #DeclineNow members hope that their methods of gaming the algorithm will ensure that drivers get higher pay in the long run.

Declining low-paying deliveries sounds like a neat hack and #DeclineNow members say that pay is increasing for DoorDash drivers around the country.