zzdcar
Home
/
Reviews
/
Tech
/
I Dispelled A Big Tesla Autopilot Myth By Running Tests On A Tesla Model Y
I Dispelled A Big Tesla Autopilot Myth By Running Tests On A Tesla Model Y-April 2024
2024-02-19 EST 22:10:27

Image for article titled I Dispelled A Big Tesla Autopilot Myth By Running Tests On A Tesla Model Y

I’ll admit that no matter how many times I hear this particular myth about Tesla Autopilot or , I’m always surprised. I’m surprised because it’s something that Tesla itself makes very clear in its documentation, but somehow the truth hasn’t gotten to many Tesla owners. The myth has to do with what a Tesla on Autopilot or FSD does if it does not get a response from the driver. So, to settle this once and for all, I tested it, and videoed what happened.

Here’s what the myth is: there is an alarmingly high number of Tesla owners who believe that, while using Autopilot or FSD, if a driver does not respond to the vehicle’s repeated prompts to pay attention and take hold of the steering wheel, the car will put on its hazard lights and carefully come to a stop on the side of the road, out of the active traffic lane.

Image for article titled I Dispelled A Big Tesla Autopilot Myth By Running Tests On A Tesla Model Y

I’ve heard this from many Tesla owners and fans; when I was on the YouTube show of a particularly rabid Tesla fan, , for example. As much as I hate to give him more YouTube views, I think it’s worth doing this one time, since my whole point here is that he’s wrong:

“They don’t just stop in the middle of the road. No, they pull over to the side of the road,” the rabid Tesla fan says in the clip. I’ve heard similar remarks from many others who are generally smart and well-informed people, including, most recently, a journalist and Tesla-owner at event earlier this month.

That journalist—again, someone actually in the business of Knowing Things About Cars—insisted to me that Teslas pull off the road, out of an active traffic lane, when they have to disengage Autopilot due to a lack of driver response.

I even showed this journalist the part of Tesla’s own owners manual where the company makes it pretty damn clear what its cars will do in this event:

Image for article titled I Dispelled A Big Tesla Autopilot Myth By Running Tests On A Tesla Model Y

We can’t fault Tesla here; that’s a very clear explanation: the car chimes, turns on the hazard lights, and stops. That’s it. It doesn’t leave the lane of traffic. If you have a stroke while in your Autopilot-active Tesla doing 80 in the fast lane of the highway, that fast lane is exactly where your car will come to a stop, a nice blinking target for getting rear-ended by the next car that comes speeding along.

Even after seeing the owner’s manual, the journalist still didn’t believe me, but he did agree to do a test himself at some point. I got tired of waiting, which is why this article exists.

(That journalist also took a goofy picture of himself fake-choking me to show to his Tesla friends, which I thought was kinda weird, but, whatever. I’m not here to kink-shame).

Anyway, for my own tests, I reached out and found a happy, satisfied Tesla owner who was willing to help. This owner has both a Model 3 and a Model Y and a very cute dog named Bodhi. We only used the Model Y in this test, though Bodhi was present.

Because this test involves stopping in the middle of an active lane of traffic, and since no one involved wanted an accident, we did the run late at night, on as empty a stretch of road as possible. As a result, this footage isn’t exactly exciting, but that’s hardly the point.

I mounted a camera in the Model Y pointed at the windshield and main display so you can see the “Autopilot” system requesting the driver take control, then flashing and beeping, after which you can see the disengagement display.

I also shot the car from my Pao, driving behind the Tesla, so you can see the Tesla come to a stop from the outside.

Okay, here’s the inside camera showing one disengagement:

Tesla AP disengagement

...and here it is from behind:

Tesla AP Disengagement (chase car)

We did two runs, with the same effect both times. The road’s shoulder was grassy, but a car could easily have pulled off onto it. We decided not to do our video on the highway due to the amount of traffic and the inherent danger of stopping in an active highway lane. With that said, the Tesla’s owner confirmed that he later tried the same test on a highway with a paved shoulder lane, and got the same result.

If you don’t believe that, here’s a video showing a Tesla Model S stopping in the middle of the road after detecting an unresponsive driver (a move that may have saved this driver’s life, it’s worth noting):

I want to be clear that while I’m singling out Tesla in this test, mostly because it is about Teslas that I usually hear this myth, every single carmaker that sells a Level 2 semi-automated system does not do anything any better.

Even Mercedes-Benz’ alleged “Level 3" system A Mercedes PR person told me there were regulations in place that prevented vehicles from leaving the traffic lane, and it seems this is the regulation in question: — specifically, these parts:

5.1.1. The activated system shall exercise control over systems required to support the driver in resuming manual control at any time (e.g. demist, windscreen wipers and lights).

5.1.4. A transition demand shall not endanger the safety of the vehicle occupants or other road users.

5.1.5. During a minimum risk manoeuvre, the system shall minimise risks to safety of the vehicle occupants and other road users. 5.1.6. T

[...]

5.5.1 or, in case the lane markings are not visible, remain on an appropriate trajectory taking into account surrounding traffic and road infrastructure, with an aim of achieving a deceleration demand not greater than 4.0 m/s².

Higher deceleration demand values are permissible for very short durations, e.g. as haptic warning to stimulate the driver’s attention, or in case of a severe ALKS or severe vehicle failure.

Additionally, the signal to activate the hazard warning lights shall be generated with the start of the minimum risk manoeuvre.

According to this, the defined “minimum risk manoeuvre” is just stopping right in the active traffic lane, which really doesn’t strike me as being “minimum risk.” If this is actually why no automakers are leaving the active traffic lane when they possibly could, then I think this regulation needs to be reconsidered.

It’s not an American regulation, though, so it technically shouldn’t be what’s holding back cars in our market from getting out of the way, I don’t think.

Stopping in an active traffic lane is never a good idea. On city streets, at low speeds, it’s more of a traffic flow problem, but on highways or back roads or in situations where the car stops over the crest of a hill or around a turn it can very, very easily lead to crashes. It’s worth noting that it does happen sometimes when there’s gridlock on a freeway (an iconic example is of course LA’s 101), but it’s a bit easier to see a pack of 1,000 cars stopped than just one with its flashers on.

Would you feel comfortable just stopping in your lane on a highway, and sitting in the car with the hazards on? Hell no. It’s a terrible idea.

If we’re going to continue selling cars with while also not-not driving, then at the very least the cars need to be able to get out of the way of traffic if a driver isn’t responsive.

Just so it’s clear, I do think that having the car come to a safe stop automatically is better than it, say, not stopping and crashing. Of course it’s better. And, on most city streets and low-speed situations, it’s fine. But on a highway, while it’s better than doing nothing, it’s just not better enough. If you don’t believe me, just think one more time how you’d feel parked in a lane on a major highway. It’s not good.

We’ve seen people abuse L2 . We know people are not always able to be relied upon to keep alert when the machine is doing much of the driving. We know one of the big advantages of these systems is their potential to keep people alive when they have a medical issue behind the wheel.

So why not make sure that the way this disengagement happens ends up with the car out of harm’s way?

It’s not an easy problem to solve, and, worse, it’s not a sexy one. I don’t really know.

But what I do know is that it’s important to solve this, likely more important than making these L2 systems better at driving. This should be the next major priority: Whenever possible, make all semi-automated systems get out of the way when they need to disengage.

And, as a reminder to anyone who still believes otherwise (and I’ll admit that, for many who have watched Tesla “Autopilot” videos, this may have been obvious), watch those videos again. Teslas just stop right in their lane. They do not pull off the road. Nobody’s car does. Do not think this is even an option.

Are we all clear here? Am I never going to have to hear this bullshit again? Good.

Comments
Welcome to zzdcar comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
Tech
Animal Feces, Doors Falling Off, Huge Rust Holes: Here's Everything Wrong With David Tracy's $1500 Jeep FC
Animal Feces, Doors Falling Off, Huge Rust Holes: Here's Everything Wrong With David Tracy's $1500 Jeep FC
will be full of batteries and an electric motor someday, but its current state is what an optimist would call a glass half full — of rodent droppings, urine and bird nests. With most of its doors literally falling off and windows cracked, the Jeep is mostly crap, literally...
Apr 6, 2026
Tesla Thinks Battery Swaps Are Bad Now
Tesla Thinks Battery Swaps Are Bad Now
According a report from , Tesla is no longer interested in developing a battery swap procedure, contrary to recent rumors. In 2013, Tesla demonstrated a battery swap using a modified version of now-defunct startup Better Place’s battery swap system. Tesla actually constructed one facility in Harris Ranch, California, though...
Apr 6, 2026
The 2022 Volvo C40 Recharge Is Available Only Online
The 2022 Volvo C40 Recharge Is Available Only Online
Volvo is going , promising to be 50 percent electrified by 2025 and 100 percent electric in 2030. On the way there, Volvo is also going for its electric car sales. That will be the only way to get the new battery-electric C40 Recharge, a sloping-roof version of the...
Apr 6, 2026
A Tesla-Stan Showed Me What They Thought Was An Amazing Autopilot Save But Boy Is It Not
A Tesla-Stan Showed Me What They Thought Was An Amazing Autopilot Save But Boy Is It Not
You may remember last week when I wrote from a Tesla driving via its semi-autonomous system; this week, I have another one, but this one is a little different because it was brought to my attention by a Tesla-stan who was very sure this would end up in us writing...
Apr 6, 2026
How All-Wheel Drive Works: A Ridiculously Detailed Technical Explainer
How All-Wheel Drive Works: A Ridiculously Detailed Technical Explainer
may seem like simple concepts, but in reality, there are dozens of widely different systems out there, and a lot of confusion in marketing material and in “common knowledge.” The dead of winter seems like the perfect time for me to publish this ridiculously deep-dive on the various ways...
Apr 6, 2026
You Used To Be Able To Buy A Radio For Your Roof
You Used To Be Able To Buy A Radio For Your Roof
When it comes to car dashboards and instrument clusters, a certain amount of standardization has sort of organically happened over the years. By some mystical, unspoken decrees, most automakers (there are exceptions, of course) have agreed where most of the common controls can be expected: wipers and indicators on...
Apr 6, 2026
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.zzdcar.com All Rights Reserved