zzdcar
Home
/
Reviews
/
Tech
/
NYT Opinion Page Editors Double Down On Being Dangerously Wrong About What Automated Driving Is
NYT Opinion Page Editors Double Down On Being Dangerously Wrong About What Automated Driving Is-February 2024
2024-02-19 EST 22:10:26

Image for article titled NYT Opinion Page Editors Double Down On Being Dangerously Wrong About What Automated Driving Is

Last week, that was written by a writer who had borrowed a Cadillac Escalade and spent an entire road trip being very confused by how the Level 2 driver assist system was working. The author of that piece desperately and potentially dangerously confused a car with driver-assist features with a car that could actually drive itself. There is a massive difference between the two things, and the general public’ confusion about it is a huge problem. A problem that the NYT seems to be just fine with.

The reason I say this is because someone actually reached out to the NYT Opinion copy chief to see if any corrections or clarifications could be issued that might help people understand the very real and very significant differences between a driver assist system and an actual self-driving system (which doesn’t exist as something people can buy today).

This was the response from the NYT Opinion copy chief:

Let’s just pull that quote out of the tweet there so we can really drink it in, why not:

“In short, although the auto industry may distinguish between advanced driver-assistance systems and autonomous or self-driving vehicles, most people do not, and we do not expect them to.”

This approach is, to couch it in genteel terms, fucking terrible. Okay, NYT, even if you “do not expect” people to know the difference between advanced driver-assistance systems and self-driving vehicles, isn’t kind of part of your whole point of being to, you know, inform people?

It’s like saying that yeah, although the drug industry may distinguish between large mounds of cocaine and big piles of confectioner’s sugar, most people do not, and we do not expect them to.

I get that it’s the Opinion page, and the NYT Opinion page has a rich, proud history of being composed of of . But this is is not a matter of simple semantics. The differences between a full self-driving system and an advanced driver assist system are not a matter of opinion.

If you work for the NYT and you’d like to know what the actual distinctions are—so as to you know, not put people in mortal danger — then let me help by clarifying the differences between a full self-driving system that you will find on precisely zero (0) cars for sale to day, and an Advanced Driver Assist System (ADAS) that you’ll find on many vehicles today, from Ford to Cadillac to Volvo to Tesla and more.

Here’s the key piece of information: an ADAS (Advanced Driver Assist System) does not allow the car drive itself. With these systems, also called s, the person in the driver’s seat is in constant control of the car. It’s like cruise control.

An ADAS system may require the driver to take total control at any time, possibly with no warning at all. As a result, the driver’s attention needs to remain focused on the road, what the car is doing, the overall situation at all times, just like they were driving, only that task has been changed from the usual active task of driving into a vigilance task of monitoring how the machine is driving, and remaining ready to intercede.

This sort of vigilance task is, by the way, doing.

I reached out to the same @NYTopinion copy chief myself asking them to talk about this, but have yet to get a response.

So, New York Times Opinion page, I’ll just tell you what I was going to say right here: you have to do better than this. You are correct that the general public is confused about the differences between ADAS systems and full self-driving, and part of why is because sloppy bullshit about these technologies keeps getting written and published, some of it right on your pages.

The differences between these systems isn’t any more an “opinion” than the differences between a kiwi fruit and a small rabid hedgehog are. They may seem similar if you’re not really paying attention, but when you bring them to your mouth one gives a fuzzy sensation, then a tangy burst of flavor, and the other gives a fuzzy sensation, then intense pain as a crazed animal bites through your lip.

Confusing these two systems is exactly how with L2 . You know there’s confusion here, you have direct access to the people who are confused, and you choose to do nothing, or even make the situation worse?

Knock it off. Stop being shitheads, and make this important information available to your readers.

It’s absurd I even had to write this.

Comments
Welcome to zzdcar comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
Tech
See The 2020 C8 Corvette's Nose Lift In Action
See The 2020 C8 Corvette's Nose Lift In Action
Among the many cool things about the , the is probably the coolest. Most sports cars need a nose lift feature. Here is the Corvette’s in action. As we’ve explained in the past, the new Corvette has a hydraulically-actuated front suspension lift system, which can supposedly raise the car’s ground...
Feb 17, 2026
The Autonomous Vehicle Industry Would Turn Sidewalks Into Cages If It Could
The Autonomous Vehicle Industry Would Turn Sidewalks Into Cages If It Could
The challenges facing autonomous car companies are generally separated into two categories: getting the technology to work and getting society to accept the technology. And a recent New York Times article makes the case that the rest of society should make an awful lot of concessions to get out...
Feb 17, 2026
VW's Emissions Scandal Cost Other German Automakers $5.2 Billion in U.S. Sales: Study
VW's Emissions Scandal Cost Other German Automakers $5.2 Billion in U.S. Sales: Study
German cars have a reputation for precision and attention to detail. But only four years ago, they gained another reputation—as liars and cheaters when it came to emissions. It was all thanks to , and it cost not just Volkswagen, but all German automakers, billions of dollars. According to...
Feb 17, 2026
You'll Soon Be Able to Stream Netflix and YouTube in Your Tesla
You'll Soon Be Able to Stream Netflix and YouTube in Your Tesla
When I get in my car, there are plenty of things I aim to do: set up the GPS, hook up some tunes, quadruple-check that I haven’t forgotten my wallet again, etc. I can’t say that I’m really itching to catch up on all the Netflix shows I’ve been...
Feb 17, 2026
This Is How A New Car Learns To 'See'
This Is How A New Car Learns To 'See'
If you’re buying a new luxury car, it has a lot of gizmos to keep you from smashing into things. There are digital eyes that help you see better. Radar to help your car see other cars. Cameras to help identify lane markings. None of them, though, are worth...
Feb 17, 2026
The Electric Mini Cooper SE Is a Lot of Fun. But Is That Enough?
The Electric Mini Cooper SE Is a Lot of Fun. But Is That Enough?
This new is a perfect example of what BMW’s trying to do with EVs today, and also unintentionally, the shortcomings of its approach. Formula E is more than just a new kind of racing. As motorsport director told me, the series is a chance to create a direct research and...
Feb 17, 2026
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.zzdcar.com All Rights Reserved