zzdcar
Home
/
Reviews
/
Tech
/
NYT Opinion Page Editors Double Down On Being Dangerously Wrong About What Automated Driving Is
NYT Opinion Page Editors Double Down On Being Dangerously Wrong About What Automated Driving Is-August 2024
2024-02-19 EST 22:10:26

Image for article titled NYT Opinion Page Editors Double Down On Being Dangerously Wrong About What Automated Driving Is

Last week, that was written by a writer who had borrowed a Cadillac Escalade and spent an entire road trip being very confused by how the Level 2 driver assist system was working. The author of that piece desperately and potentially dangerously confused a car with driver-assist features with a car that could actually drive itself. There is a massive difference between the two things, and the general public’ confusion about it is a huge problem. A problem that the NYT seems to be just fine with.

The reason I say this is because someone actually reached out to the NYT Opinion copy chief to see if any corrections or clarifications could be issued that might help people understand the very real and very significant differences between a driver assist system and an actual self-driving system (which doesn’t exist as something people can buy today).

This was the response from the NYT Opinion copy chief:

Let’s just pull that quote out of the tweet there so we can really drink it in, why not:

“In short, although the auto industry may distinguish between advanced driver-assistance systems and autonomous or self-driving vehicles, most people do not, and we do not expect them to.”

This approach is, to couch it in genteel terms, fucking terrible. Okay, NYT, even if you “do not expect” people to know the difference between advanced driver-assistance systems and self-driving vehicles, isn’t kind of part of your whole point of being to, you know, inform people?

It’s like saying that yeah, although the drug industry may distinguish between large mounds of cocaine and big piles of confectioner’s sugar, most people do not, and we do not expect them to.

I get that it’s the Opinion page, and the NYT Opinion page has a rich, proud history of being composed of of . But this is is not a matter of simple semantics. The differences between a full self-driving system and an advanced driver assist system are not a matter of opinion.

If you work for the NYT and you’d like to know what the actual distinctions are—so as to you know, not put people in mortal danger — then let me help by clarifying the differences between a full self-driving system that you will find on precisely zero (0) cars for sale to day, and an Advanced Driver Assist System (ADAS) that you’ll find on many vehicles today, from Ford to Cadillac to Volvo to Tesla and more.

Here’s the key piece of information: an ADAS (Advanced Driver Assist System) does not allow the car drive itself. With these systems, also called s, the person in the driver’s seat is in constant control of the car. It’s like cruise control.

An ADAS system may require the driver to take total control at any time, possibly with no warning at all. As a result, the driver’s attention needs to remain focused on the road, what the car is doing, the overall situation at all times, just like they were driving, only that task has been changed from the usual active task of driving into a vigilance task of monitoring how the machine is driving, and remaining ready to intercede.

This sort of vigilance task is, by the way, doing.

I reached out to the same @NYTopinion copy chief myself asking them to talk about this, but have yet to get a response.

So, New York Times Opinion page, I’ll just tell you what I was going to say right here: you have to do better than this. You are correct that the general public is confused about the differences between ADAS systems and full self-driving, and part of why is because sloppy bullshit about these technologies keeps getting written and published, some of it right on your pages.

The differences between these systems isn’t any more an “opinion” than the differences between a kiwi fruit and a small rabid hedgehog are. They may seem similar if you’re not really paying attention, but when you bring them to your mouth one gives a fuzzy sensation, then a tangy burst of flavor, and the other gives a fuzzy sensation, then intense pain as a crazed animal bites through your lip.

Confusing these two systems is exactly how with L2 . You know there’s confusion here, you have direct access to the people who are confused, and you choose to do nothing, or even make the situation worse?

Knock it off. Stop being shitheads, and make this important information available to your readers.

It’s absurd I even had to write this.

Comments
Welcome to zzdcar comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
Tech
Online-Based Ridesharing Mobility-as-a-Service Platform for Sale
Online-Based Ridesharing Mobility-as-a-Service Platform for Sale
A new mobility platform with an iconic brand and innovative approach to scalable modality is for sale, . The service, which boasts nearly 17 million yearly active users, uses a web-and-app-based purchasing platform to coordinate new mobility solutions using large transportation modules in a highly scalable, environmentally-friendly platform that...
Aug 24, 2025
Volkswagen Delivers What We've All Been Wanting in a Concept Car: Holograms in the Trunk
Volkswagen Delivers What We've All Been Wanting in a Concept Car: Holograms in the Trunk
Have you ever been driving a car nice and hard, really giving it the beans and pushing it hard through the corners, when the realization suddenly hits you that, hey, this thing would be much better if there was a big hologram emitter in the floor of the trunk?...
Aug 24, 2025
Uber Lost Another Billion Dollars, NBD
Uber Lost Another Billion Dollars, NBD
Uber’s as a publicly-traded company tells us much of the same as report the about its finances: they can’t stop, won’t stop losing so much freaking money. In the first quarter of 2019, Uber lost $1.034 billion. Yes, billion, with a B. In three months. Following very quickly in...
Aug 24, 2025
Volkswagen's Trying to Solve the Problem of Motion Sickness in Autonomous Cars
Volkswagen's Trying to Solve the Problem of Motion Sickness in Autonomous Cars
aren’t nearly as close as some automakers or tech companies would like the rest of the world to think, but, while we’re all thinking about them, we might as well also think about the consequences as well. Not danger, nor death, nor a potential machine uprising—no, more simple than...
Aug 24, 2025
Uber Launches New Program to Get Drivers Who Can't Afford Cars to Drive Cars for Them
Uber Launches New Program to Get Drivers Who Can't Afford Cars to Drive Cars for Them
Uber was once a modest company with modest goals: unleash the power of the free market in a heavily-regulated industry to provide on-demand, convenient rides while allowing folks with cars to make extra cash driving people around. It didn’t take long for that modest goal to morph into much...
Aug 24, 2025
Different Strokes For Different Folks: A Super Cruise Discussion
Different Strokes For Different Folks: A Super Cruise Discussion
GM’s Super Cruise system is, by , the best semi-autonomous system on the market today.If safety is part of the consideration, and it should be, then it is . But it isn’t without its flaws, such as about direct sunlight throwing the system into total confusion and kicking control...
Aug 24, 2025
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.zzdcar.com All Rights Reserved