zzdcar
Home
/
Reviews
/
Culture
/
Tesla Autopilot Let Driver Keep Hands Off Wheel A Whole Lot In Fire Truck Crash: Feds
Tesla Autopilot Let Driver Keep Hands Off Wheel A Whole Lot In Fire Truck Crash: Feds-June 2024
2024-02-19 EST 22:12:56

Image for article titled Tesla Autopilot Let Driver Keep Hands Off Wheel A Whole Lot In Fire Truck Crash: Feds

Back in January, a 2014 Tesla Model S , and while no injuries were reported it did raise questions as to whether the car’s semi-autonomous Autopilot driver aid was engaged before the wreck. Today, the National Transportation Safety Board released its report on the incident and the facts laid out make it pretty clear the driver was not aware of what was going on at the time of the crash.

It’s also established that Autopilot was on and remained engaged despite the driver’s inattention, and it seems to be a case study in how semi-autonomous driving can go horribly wrong.

The future of driving is supposed to feel like flying. The names some car companies give their…

The NTSB launched an investigation into the incident in the first place because the driver said Autopilot was engaged.

Using the vehicle’s system data, the NTSB found that when the crash occurred, Autopilot “was active and had been engaged for 13 minutes, 48 seconds.” The investigation further found: “In the final segment leading up to the crash, the driver had his hands off the wheel 12 minutes, 57 seconds.”

During that 13 minutes, the car alerted the driver to place his hands on the wheel four times, which he did, and then apparently took them right off again.

He was, in the parlance of airplane pilots, “minding the alarm,” meaning his actions were more geared towards the alarms of the system rather than to the conditions of the road.

The evidence gathered by the NTSB further suggests the driver was not paying attention to basic vehicle conditions. For example, in an interview he told the NTSB he thought the car was going about 65 mph at the time of the crash. In fact, the NTSB found the Tesla was traveling “from 4-24 mph.”

On top of that, there’s the question of whether the driver was on his phone at the time of the crash. The driver told the NTSB that he was not. Although phone records don’t show any outgoing or incoming call or text activity, the NTSB notes this cannot account for other phone usage such as any chat application or data usage. The report notes that Tesla obtained a witness statement from a passenger in a passing car who reported the driver seemed to be on his phone, or at the very least distracted:

I could see the driver and I saw his head leaned far forward as he appeared to be looking down at a cell phone or other device he was holding in his left hand. From what I could see, it appeared his right hand may have been touching the steering wheel.

Obviously, Tesla would not go out of its way to obtain a witness statement unless it supported the conclusion the company wanted, which is this was a driver error, not an Autopilot problem. But the witness account does align more closely with the NTSB’s conclusion regarding the Tesla’s speed at the time of the crash, who observed: “the vehicle was traveling closer to 30-40 mph.”

It’s possible the driver was not distracted by a phone, but by the coffee and bagel he was, by his own admission, in the process of eating around the time of the crash, although he could not remember if he had them in his hands at the time of the crash itself.

There are also other, less surprising details to the NTSB’s findings. The driver did not read Tesla’s manual, like almost every other person who owns any car anywhere ever. He learned of Autopilot’s features and limitations from a Tesla salesman, and generally found Autopilot to be reliable. He told investigators “the name Autopilot did not accurately describe its use because the vehicle does not fully drive itself,” but his behavior seems to indicate he did not fully internalize that message.

Most damning for Tesla is that the NTSB found the last “hand on the wheel” alert was given “about nine minutes” into the final 13-minute segment before the crash, meaning almost four minutes went by between the final alert and the crash. Overall, the driver of that final 13-minute segment.

Tesla did not immediately respond to a request for comment prior to publication.

By marketing Autopilot in the way that it does, Tesla assumes a greater responsibility than other automakers for what drivers do (or do not do) when it’s engaged. Only semi-autonomous cars allow drivers to have their hands off the wheel for so much time, and nearly all other semi-autonomous features from other carmakers do not allow drivers to be hands-free for 12 of 13 minutes (except GM’s Super Cruise, which uses cameras to tell if the driver is looking at the road ahead and disengages within seconds if they avert their gaze).

In this case, Tesla and the driver were both incredibly fortunate there were no firefighters in the rear of the truck at the time of the crash. This could have been a lot worse.

Here’s the full by on Scribd:

Comments
Welcome to zzdcar comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
Culture
I Entered My Lifted Miata In A Real Off-Road Race, Here's What Happened
I Entered My Lifted Miata In A Real Off-Road Race, Here's What Happened
I have two automotive loves: The first is the Miata, the second is off-road racing. For a while I raced air-cooled Volkswagens in the deserts of California and Nevada and I was lucky enough to co-drive in a class 11 stock bug in the Baja 1000 a few years...
Jun 20, 2025
Watch ABS Fail When MotorWeek Tests A 1997 Chevy S-10
Watch ABS Fail When MotorWeek Tests A 1997 Chevy S-10
MotorWeek’s is some of the on the internet. The long-running automotive news magazine has a treasure trove of tests after being on the air for over 40 years. Where else can you find detailed instrumented testing of long-forgotten cars like the or a ? MotorWeek’s recent Retro Review upload is...
Jun 20, 2025
Subaru Had It Right All Along
Subaru Had It Right All Along
When first came to the United States, it sold small funky cars that were decidedly un-American. As the company grew its own identity and became more established in the U.S., it became the first automaker to offer an all-wheel-drive passenger car in 1975. Subaru was also an early-adopter of...
Jun 20, 2025
I Can't Get Enough Of This YouTuber Who Builds Tiny, Fully Functional Scale-Model Cars
I Can't Get Enough Of This YouTuber Who Builds Tiny, Fully Functional Scale-Model Cars
I love tiny, of . I have a that is roughly half the size of a normal cat, and she’s perfect. I own a 2013 , which is like the miniature version of a normal-sized vehicle (at least here in Texas) — but beyond that, I also own a Hot...
Jun 20, 2025
Toyota Is Moving A Prewar 700-Ton Press Machine Halfway Around The World
Toyota Is Moving A Prewar 700-Ton Press Machine Halfway Around The World
closed its São Bernardo Plant in November 2023, marking the end of its first overseas production facility. The closure caps off a period of continuous car production in São Paolo, , lasting over 60 years. The plant was home to a Komatsu 700-ton press that predates itself. And now...
Jun 20, 2025
2024 Kia EV9: What Do You Want To Know?
2024 Kia EV9: What Do You Want To Know?
At long last, we are about to get behind the wheel of for the first time. Sure, , and sure, , and sure , but hey — what can you do? Anyway, before we get behind the wheel of this three-row electric beast, we want to know what you...
Jun 20, 2025
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.zzdcar.com All Rights Reserved